The frequent journeys by JACKSONs from England to Ireland in the 1630s is interesting. At present, I have no knowledge about if or how these people in the chart beneath may or may not be related. There are certainly a few tantalizing mentions of JACKSONs in Coleraine prior to the 1630s, and their eventual full time settlement in Ireland happened soon after – if not before.
Sharon Oddie Brown. November 18, 2016
|
JACKSONs in registers of ships travelling from England to
Ireland. NOTE: This is just a start on this.
Forename |
Surname |
Est
Birth |
Departure
Date |
Port of
Departure |
Destination |
Dates |
Richard |
Jackson |
1597 |
1632 Aug 24 |
Chester |
Dublin |
He was 35 years old.. |
Elizabeth |
Jackson |
— |
1632 Mar 9 |
Chester |
Dublin
|
No birth date given. |
Cisly |
Jackson |
1608 |
1632 Nov 25 |
Chester |
Dublin |
She was 24 years old. |
William |
Jackson |
1572 |
1632 Sep 30 |
Liverpool |
Coleraine |
He was 60 years old. NOTE:
He was not the same William JACKSON (abt 1575-1626) of Kirkby Lonsdale who
was the grandfather of most of the later JACKSONs of Coleraine. His voyage
is, however, a fit with the family narrative of many of the JACKSON men being
merchants – drapers or Clothworkers –who travelled back and forth between England
and Ireland in the early 1600s. |
Richard |
Jackson |
1593 |
1633 Apr 10 |
Chester |
Dublin |
He was 39 years old. |
Thomas |
Jackson |
1603 |
1633 Jul 27 |
Chester |
Dublin |
He was 30 years old. |
John |
Jackson |
1593 |
1633 Aug 12 |
Chester |
Carrickfergus |
He was 40 years old. There is a slight possibility that this John JACKSON could be the father of the Robert JACKSON
born btw 1619-1624 of Eccleston, Lancashire. This Robert JACKSON died 1679 –
probably in Co. Down. His descendants held leases to land in the parish of
Dundonald and Newtown, Co. Down. SEE: Ratliffe JACKSON beneath. His name is
directly after John’s name on the register. They are likely related. |
Ratliffe |
Jackson |
1579 |
1633 Aug 12 |
Chester |
Carrickfergus |
He was 54 years old. I cannot be certain that the name has
been correctly transcribed, although it looks like Ratliffe. SEE: John
JACKSON above. His name preceded Ratliffe’s name in the record. They are
likely related. |
|
